tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3339915911356078232.post2442515729867912510..comments2024-03-07T09:10:48.658-05:00Comments on MDaware.org: (Landmark vs US) vs (DL vs VL)mdawarehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11511273712090189564noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3339915911356078232.post-41635540637033891032012-09-18T08:11:38.804-04:002012-09-18T08:11:38.804-04:00Thanks for the comment! I agree that SC *may* be f...Thanks for the comment! I agree that SC *may* be faster in some situations, particularly in hypotensive/hypovolemic patients, and doesn't necessitate US (although I'm looking forward to playing with US in SC when I get the chance, see http://ultrarounds.com/Ultrarounds/Subclavian_Ultrasound.html as well as my posts: Questions, Answers, and Q&A with Haney on SCUS, all from August 2012).<br />It was no accident that the above discussion doesn't address SC!mdawarehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11511273712090189564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3339915911356078232.post-38146146784006559462012-09-18T05:40:44.173-04:002012-09-18T05:40:44.173-04:00I might be showing my age, but if I had only one m...I might be showing my age, but if I had only one minute to get a line, I'd chose a subclavian (either infra- or supraclavicular) approach (Crit Care Med 2002 Vol. 30, No. 2). Despite protests to the contrary, ultrasound has not been proven to be definitively helpful in the subclavian approach.owleddochttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06942969688050773458noreply@blogger.com