May 23, 2012

Selling Ice Cream in the Desert

It's clear from both evidence and experience that NIV (aka NIPPV, CPAP, BiPAP, etc.) is very helpful for many if not most (or all) of the acutely ill, dyspneic patients on a range of outcomes: symptom improvement, oxygenation, potential avoidable intubation, or preoxygenation for intubation.

However, many patients are initially resistant to NIV for a variety of reasons including:

  • hypoxic delirium
  • delirium from the disease process itself
  • hypercarbia
  • sensation of drowning, i.e. the worst sensation in the world
While some may question why patients don't always instantly welcome lifesaving therapy with open armed-compliance, it's easy to understand why someone you've never met strapping a mask to your head that blows air into your face you from a big noisy machine while other people prod you with needles and place stickers and cuffs on you while monitors and vents alarm left and right on may not seem like the most comfortable situation in the world.

Over the past few years, I've developed my own habit for "maximizing patient compliance" with initial NIV, or really, how to help someone on the worst day of their life:


1) Set the mood
EM 101. Speak calmly & slowly like this seemingly crazy situation is absolutely routine for you.* Be nice to the patient. Reassure the patient that you know how terrible they feel right now, and that things will get better soon.
2) Explain that the patient is in charge
Explain nicely that while it first it may seem that the machine is blowing air in their face, after the machine figures out how they breathe, the patient drives the machine.
3) Mask only first
Put the NIV mask on the patient prior to hooking it up to the vent. If you have a friend, simultaneous symmetrical strap-tightening can help get the fit right the first time. No matter how low the settings, the vent ends up blowing some air all over the place, and that's just not comfortable. Ask any dog how that feels.
4) 0/0
Set the pressure to 0/0 and FiO2 100%. While the vent will still blow a little at first, it will really just provide fresh, clean oxygen when the patient breathes.
5) Deep breath: take the wheel
Calmly tell the patient to take some big breathes. The vent will catch on to the patient's respirations.
6) 0/2
Just a little PEEP to acclimate the patient to positive pressure...
7) ...slowly dial up
2 cm H2O of PS or PEEP at a time until at a reasonable starting pressure (e.g. 10/5 aka 15/5). I use about 10-15 seconds between dial-ups.
8) Smooth talk the patient
Some patients still need some gentle reassurance, even after a few minutes or intermittently thereafter. Sell it. Lay a gentle hand on their shoulder. Encourage them. Play some smooth jazz PRN.
*Pharamacologic Threshold*
I have a pretty high threshold to medicate patients to get them to tolerate NIV. All of these meds can cause respiratory and/or cognitive depression, and/or vomiting into a mask that forces air into their lungs. 
If you are giving meds you need to be fully prepped to give an ET tube. 
And, few patients need meds if you really lay on the smooth talk. 
9) Consider a SMALL dose of fentanyl
Something like 12.5-25 mcg. Be gentle. Fentanyl targets air hunger and can make NIV tolerable.
10) PSA
The end of the algorithm is essentially step 1 of DSI -- ketamine or dexmedetomidine to preserve respiratory drive and airway reflexes. Like NIV in any patient, there are 2 parallel paths: potentially stave off intubation while providing ideal preoxygenation if intubation in necessary.
The caveat is that in CO2 retainers, FiO2 should be "low" to target an SpO2 around 90-92% to avoid loss of respiratory drive.** If you decide that the patient requires glottic plastic supplementation, ratchet up the FiO2 ASAP to 100% to preoxygenate & denitrogenate.

*because it is
**not sure I totally buy that pathophysiology, but it looks bad if your COPD patient crumps with a sat of 100%, and it might be true.

May 18, 2012

DSI Screencast


Screencast of my senior talk on DSI & case series preliminary data

Hosted by Minh Le Cong at PHARM (available free on iTunes)



Special thanks, of course, to Scott Weingart

May 15, 2012

Top Six Sources

my Top Six blogs, podcasts, websites, and iPhone apps at SAEM 2012 by Scott Joing of HQMedEd


(note the flattering screenshot)

in no particular order*:

blogs: Resus.me & EM Lit of Note

podcast: Emergency Medical Abstracts (subscription; free with resident EMRA membership)

websites:
EMCrit - beyond the podcast (free; CME available for small fee)
Life in the Fast Lane

iPhone apps:
eyeChart
Metronome

also linked by Life in the Fast Lane

*Behind the Curtain: iPhone apps were done last so there could be only 1 edit to show the apps

April 29, 2012

Just Like Spiderman

A recent twitter conversation went very quickly from placement of IOs to appropriate critical usage of evidence based medicine. Below, see a nice series of 4 (short) essays on EBM -- a debate between Gordon Guyatt, described as the "founding father of EBM" and Marty Tobin, the great intensivist (whose son may or may not have been in my anatomy group as an M1), "all taking place in the pages of the journal Chest." The 2 quoted phrases as well as this debate and the articles were referred to me by the great Canadian EM/CC/US Dr. Rob Arntfield.

My impression of the debate: EBM is wonderful, but of course has its limitations. It's not as simple as RCT=great, no RCT=terrible; but some questions we can better answer with better evidence. And like Spiderman (and everything) we have to be responsible and critically apply evidence. Some questions aren't amenable to RCTs* so do the best with what you can. That is why most PEM docs still fluid resuscitate sepsis kiddies, and I still place LMAs in cardiac arrests even though it might lower measured carotid flow in 9 pigs.
The debate (all articles are free):
Point: evidence-based medicine has a sound scientific base.
Karanicolas PJ, Kunz R, Guyatt GH.
Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1067-71

Counterpoint: evidence-based medicine lacks a sound scientific base.Tobin MJ.
Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1071-4

Rebuttal From Dr. Guyatt et al
Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc, FCCP, Paul J. Karanicolas, MD, and Regina Kunz, MD, PhD
Chest. 2008 May; 133 (5):1074-1075

Rebuttal From Dr. Tobin
Martin J. Tobin
Chest. 2008 May;133 (5):1076-1077

*for these, you can randomize poor dying African children to standard therapy vs placebo

April 26, 2012

Roc vs Sux

Special thanks to Reuben Strayer

As a followup to some recent online discussion about the time of onset of paralysis of rocuronium, I checked with the most devoted rocuronium supporter I know who sent me the references below. Reuben's  excellent and concise (8 minutes) lecture on roc vs sux is much more comprehensive, but I specifically want to review the small amount of data on time of onset of paralysis. Of course there is certainly more data out there; I just used the 4 references he sent me.

Caveat: these are OR patients, but I just want the time of onset data so it should be close if not equivalent

Study 1:
outcome: measured paralysis (no response in T1 in TOF monitoring)
Roc 1.2 mg/kg
n=10 adults
mean 55 s
SD 14 s
range 36-84 s
Sux 1 mg/kg
n=10 adults
mean 50 s
SD 17 s
range 24-84 s
Study 2:

children (mean age 6.4 and 6.8 years)
outcome: apnea (not clear how they decided exactly on apnea times)
Roc 1.2 mg/kg
n=13 children (1 did not get as the roc precipitated in the IV line)
mean 15.6s
SD 7.4s
range 5-30s
Sux 1.5 mg/kg
n=13 children
mean 22.3 s
SD 12.8 s
range 12-62 s
These are only 46 patients, including 25 children, and by no means definitive. But the time of onset of paralysis is certainly comparable if not equivalent in properly dosed roc (1.2 mg/kg)

These 2 papers, as well as the 2 other citations below, also demonstrate equivalent intubating conditions between roc & sux, which is what really matters.

References:
1: Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1993 Nov;79(5):913-8.
2:Mazurek AJ, Rae B, Hann S, Kim JI, Castro B, Coté CJ. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine: are they equally effective during rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia? Anesth Analg. 1998 Dec;87(6):1259-62.

additional studies on equivalent intubating conditions:

Patanwala AE, Stahle SA, Sakles JC, Erstad BL. Comparison of succinylcholine and rocuronium for first-attempt intubation success in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;18(1):10-4.
Heier T, Caldwell JE. Rapid tracheal intubation with large-dose rocuronium: a probability-based approach. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jan;90(1):175-9.

April 21, 2012

How to Give Residents Credit for Listening to Podcasts

My co-chiefs and I have article in Annals of EM (epub before print) on asynchronous learning / individualized interactive instruction, aka how to give residents conference credit for listening to podcasts.